http://www.sophos.co m/blogs/gc/g/2008/12 /02/do-you-really-ne ed-anti-virus-on-you r-apple-mac/
http://www.youtub e.com/watch?v=KELCTP AHp14&feature=channe l_page
Emeek claims that their is no Virus's for a Mac yah sssssssuuuuuuuuurrrr rrreeeeee
Mac has viruses but ... By: applerocks. on 04 Jan 09, 15:54:13 Mac has viruses but very few like 50 to 60..Now that apple is getting popular and Hackers are turning there targets on Mac OS X too.
I see, well then ... By: IamtheVOICE123. on 01 Jan 09, 22:16:55 I see, well then thanks for letting me know, a friend of mine gave me that online for usage and without thinking i guess i should have seen if it was up to date or not... thanks for the info, damnit all my links for malware and virus's for the mac is in my other computer (really old dell working with right now)
uhm the first ... By: dannewashere. on 01 Jan 09, 22:12:36 uhm the first article is 9 years old and doesn't even mention Os x . maybe you didnt know but apples operating systems before os x was not based on unix. Os 9 had a very small userbase compared to os x but it did have alot of malware and viruses. the last article is three years old and is about a security flaw that apple obviously has patched a long time ago. also according to f-secure that is mentioned in the last article the number of maliciously created software for macs is acually decreasing
htt p://ww w. faqs. ... By: IamtheVOICE123. on 01 Jan 09, 21:47:59 htt p://ww w. faqs. org/faqs/computer-virus/macintosh-faq/
ht tp://antivirus. about. com/od/macintoshresource/a/inqtanaa. htm
Try those links on for size, fyi i just woke up
sure get alot more ... By: dannewashere. on 01 Jan 09, 18:33:48 sure get alot more malware. could you please explain how the fuck macs get more malware then windows machines (or windows users if that was what u meant)??
acually i wasnt ... By: dannewashere. on 01 Jan 09, 18:30:35 acually i wasnt talking about the sophos article. i was talking about apples antivirus page. which was uppdated with new version numbers of the software. its seems that u think windows viruses does affect macs when u said that macs
Posted on December ... By: IamtheVOICE123. on 01 Jan 09, 15:56:48 Posted on December 2nd, 2008 by Graham Cluley, Sophos
Filed under: Apple, Malware
This is exactly what it says on the site, not updated in 2008, but posted, owned again... and who said anything about windows malware effecting osx?
the article was ... By: dannewashere. on 01 Jan 09, 15:46:39 the article was updated because the versions of virus protection software mentioned in the article was more then 5 years old. there is no real need for it , but no system can be completly secure. and also having antivirus software installed would prevent sending infected files to windows users. and also u cant say that macs get alot more malware then most, thats the stupidest thing i have ever heard. windows malware doesnt doesnt affect os x and thats not what they meant in the article either.
Again you do a ... By: IamtheVOICE123. on 01 Jan 09, 04:38:10 Again you do a comparison that's not really needed... and In case you didn't see what I said to Emeek, depending on the hardware, the size of the hard rive and so forth it doesn't even need to be weekly, that's only the example I gave if you had a low end computer, for a high end computer like mine, I only need to it once every 3-6 months... on a computer with medium specs and its once every 3months, but that's more or less it
Are they so ... By: gaahhhhhh. on 01 Jan 09, 03:06:38 Are they so different? What if you need to use the computer (As you might need to use your car) but you need to run 2 hours of maintenance (You need to replace a flat on your car).
You can't get as much work done (You miss your appointment). With a Mac (A MORE reliable car) you spend only 30 minutes each month running maintenance (You change the oil).
Indeed, car maintenance and computer maintenance are inherently different, but can be compared accurately.
Car maintenance and ... By: IamtheVOICE123. on 01 Jan 09, 02:59:18 Car maintenance and computer maintenance are two completely diff things, with a computer, you just do some programs, click them on and wait for it to be done, while your waiting, go do something like maybe watch a movie, thats an entire time spent done watching a movie so i think i pretty much did my point there
And you never ... By: gaahhhhhh. on 01 Jan 09, 02:30:43 And you never elaborated as to why I'm a moron. I'd like to hear that as well.
Oh and by the way, ... By: gaahhhhhh. on 01 Jan 09, 02:27:26 Oh and by the way, Yeah I did block you because I got fed up with this back and forth non-sense. I un-blocked you soon after figuring you'd let it go.
lmfao, you call ... By: gaahhhhhh. on 01 Jan 09, 02:26:17 lmfao, you call that owning someone? I don't understand where the point you're trying to make quoting me. It makes you look like more of a fool. Seriously though, Answer the question. If you had to spend 2-3 hours a week for maintenance on your car, Would you still say it was good? No. Granted, spending 30 minutes per month for maintenance on a car isn't great either. The point is, is that it's better.
If it's outdated ... By: IamtheVOICE123. on 01 Jan 09, 01:13:00 If it's outdated then why would apple bother their time with it eh?
did u read the ... By: mykeman83. on 01 Jan 09, 00:55:31 did u read the reply from apple on the article? apple took off the article from their website and they said that it was outdated and that mac os x is fully secured from the get go. i dont have an antivirus and there is absolutely no need for it. thats my opinion
Mac is for people ... By: q7j. on 09 Jan 09, 00:51:54 Mac is for people who can't even program an alarm clock...sigh
Actually I believe ... By: IamtheVOICE123. on 07 Jan 09, 08:05:03 Actually I believe I could have clarified it a bit better. They could set OSX free but at the same time they could ass some restrictions to it which would only allow people to use on their platforms. Might not be entirely fair but it would others the incentive (like me who are more willing to get the entire length of the experience)
And Yes I would actually buy a Mac if I liked the build, interface and functionality of the OS
Haha, if Apple ... By: cendrillon1978. on 07 Jan 09, 07:32:01 Haha, if Apple would set OS X free then you would try it? Your logic is flawed. If Apple set OS X free then people would buy more Macs? If you could run OS X on a cheap PC platform what incentive would people have to buy a Mac? The same is true of all the Mac specific software Logic, Final Cut, iLife etc. It would be extremely foolish from a business perspective for Apple to 'free' OS X.
I don't agree with ... By: cendrillon1978. on 07 Jan 09, 07:29:18 I don't agree with alot of what you say BUT it is good to see some real, mature discussion coming from the PC camp, rather than the childish stuff typical of ADeadRat and KingMicroSoft.
I think that's ... By: cendrillon1978. on 07 Jan 09, 07:28:24 I think that's going a bit far. Emeek is pretty fanatical about the Mac platform, but that's because he likes it so much. I don't think Apple stock is going to go up just because Emeek convinced a few hundred people to switch.
Ah my bad lol. By: IamtheVOICE123. on 05 Jan 09, 09:40:10 Ah my bad lol.
I was talking about ... By: thisithis. on 05 Jan 09, 09:36:43 I was talking about PCMonk1077 and that whole stock comment. That was a out there kinda of statement made from Zenn3k a long time ago.
If your referring ... By: IamtheVOICE123. on 05 Jan 09, 09:25:10 If your referring to the OpenGL vs. DX for games the debate has been settled already in early 2008 when the game developers hosted a conference and debate of the abilities and capabilities of OpenGL vs. DX as for gaming and it was decreed by the major power players in game development that most of their primary games will be made via DX and will see if its possible to transfer games over through OpenGL after. The debate was over for quite sometime.
Didn't I already ... By: thisithis. on 05 Jan 09, 08:33:45 Didn't I already proof that was a out there kind of statement from Zenn3k?
Actually I ended up ... By: IamtheVOICE123. on 03 Jan 09, 20:40:10 Actually I ended up figuring that out last night really when I watched his one Ustream video on there, I'm thinking of taking some of that stuff and making a video and handing it to all of his subcribers/friends and see what they think of him... as the old saying goes you play with fire, your going to get burned
Good response. You ... By: PCMonk1077. on 03 Jan 09, 09:45:17 Good response. You should remember Emeek is major Mac zealot who is only here for two reasons. One is convert everybody to the Mac platform. Two is to make money and raise his stock value.
Anybody who(PC users for example) is a threat to those of his 2 motives. He will either bash you or ignore you and try not to acknowledge you. So no matter what, he lies throught his teeth and refuse to look at the truth.
The problem i'm ... By: IamtheVOICE123. on 02 Jan 09, 21:56:41 The problem i'm seeing is not with microsoft, but i have never seen a single negotiation with the owners of microsoft and apple, as well as the creators of linux to let them use the directx or give them the coding so they could apply it to their os, if they have then i suppose i didnt see it, only had the internet for about 10 years so far
They started to do ... By: IamtheVOICE123. on 02 Jan 09, 21:54:36 They started to do a few chest games in opengl but weren't able to get the desired effects as they did, so they switched the development to directx but still used some portions of opengl back then it was a half and half deal, most videogames for the mac if you haven't noticed were mostly kind of old strategy games, and the ones that aren't were converted over by the company to work on opengl
hmm im confused ... By: dannewashere. on 02 Jan 09, 13:49:30 hmm im confused what did they do with directx in 1999?
before ms acquired Bungie in 2000 im pretty sure they only did opengl development.
Actually that's not ... By: IamtheVOICE123. on 02 Jan 09, 13:01:58 Actually that's not even true, Bungie has been using directx since early of 2001 and as early as 1999, and of course thats true yet i know that but look at it a bit closer, 2006 that came out, halo 2 was already out and they were putting out halo 1, but thanks for the post anyways
I have a desktop ... By: IamtheVOICE123. on 02 Jan 09, 13:00:11 I have a desktop not a laptop, yet again another fail from you... and what does my voice have anything to do with anything?
maybe you should ... By: dannewashere. on 02 Jan 09, 11:38:33 maybe you should watch this video: watch?v=g7-Qg7-IvGI
of course bungie switched to directx beacause microsoft bought them.
Your dad bought ... By: Cody7678. on 02 Jan 09, 04:55:42 Your dad bought your laptop anyways fuck head, learn to speak as well. You sound like TIMMY!!!!
I know, I was only ... By: emperordarius. on 25 Dec 08, 20:59:15 I know, I was only saying what the reasons are, not trying to be against your video for weak reasons.
first off our ... By: IamtheVOICE123. on 25 Dec 08, 20:48:39 first off our little argument started on a different video, try keeping it there
There are more ... By: emperordarius. on 25 Dec 08, 20:42:41 There are more windows viruses for 3 reasons:
-Windows is more popular
-Mac Os X is UNIX Based
-It's generally more difficult to make malware for UNIX-based Os-es.
Ok but I don't ... By: sunnz. on 14 Dec 08, 15:12:03 Ok but I don't think that is going to work... antivirus 2009 is a rouge virus designed for Windows for example, these people just assumes people is running Windows and it is enough to do just that...
If you really want to fuck up a Mac you really need to be looking for Mac virus, they are out there if you try to look for them.
nah thats not what ... By: IamtheVOICE123. on 14 Dec 08, 13:57:52 nah thats not what i was saying, i was just simply stating to mac users who say that their os is not capable of getting virus's try going into area where their are known to be heavy virus's and whatnot and see how long it lasts with no virus's...
I actually made a ... By: sunnz. on 14 Dec 08, 12:42:57 I actually made a similar video to yours as well, but rather, I was arguing that Windows is securer than it is in the past... so, I think it is missing the point to prove that Macs gets malware, time moves on, it is a different world now than it is in the past.
The reason why I am ... By: sunnz. on 14 Dec 08, 12:40:50 The reason why I am using Macs, well, I moved away from Windows years ago, to Linux, BSD, and Macs, and it is a bit too late to go back now.
Macs on the other ... By: sunnz. on 14 Dec 08, 12:39:47 Macs on the other hand, just haven't had the market share to be a big enough target in the past; and now they use a Unix based OS, OS X, which since they saw the insecurity Windows had, they never made the mistakes in the first place, so even though their market share is growing, they just don't experience the level of dark stuff Windows unfortunately have to have in the past.
So on many levels, I agree with you, Windows as of today, isn't that insecure, since many of its problems have been fix
Overall, in the ... By: sunnz. on 14 Dec 08, 12:37:10 Overall, in the past as long as you know a Windows user's IP, you could cause very bad things to happen to them.
Fast forward to the current time, Windows is now pretty secure by default, XP SP2 have the firewall turned on by default, no more the ping of death.
So you mean like, ... By: sunnz. on 14 Dec 08, 12:34:12 So you mean like, I'd have to go actively looking at questionable content on the net, in order to get infected?
I think then you are missing the point.
The reason why Windows is often believed to be insecure is the mistakes they did in the past, users need not visit dark corners of the the internet to get infected, but their whole C drive is exposed simply by connect on the net. Then there are major flaws such as the ping of death.
that is where the ... By: IamtheVOICE123. on 14 Dec 08, 09:51:54 that is where the large majority of malicious programs lay really all in all, but then again, you could always download a shit load of programs from limewire and try to install them, limewire is full of malicious programs
Hmm... I don't know ... By: sunnz. on 14 Dec 08, 09:41:14 Hmm... I don't know man, I don't like porn, like seriously.
lol... well ... By: IamtheVOICE123. on 14 Dec 08, 08:28:47 lol... well obviously your the smarter of the average user that wont download anything unless they are 100% sure if its not malicious software attached to what your downloading... the point is, is that mac's are about a secceptible for virus's as pc's are, but bassically do heavy searching of areas that are usually the most common place for malicious programs, such as porn sites, unsafe sites where you are allowed to download software and whatnot... that was it
I don't get the ... By: sunnz. on 14 Dec 08, 08:15:27 I don't get the challenge, I have always surf the web and stuff on my Mac without antivirus for years, what's the point?
all i was saying ... By: IamtheVOICE123. on 14 Dec 08, 05:30:32 all i was saying that mac's are just as succeptible for virus's as a pc is, thats about it
hey im not sayin ... By: heyfug118. on 14 Dec 08, 05:14:22 hey im not sayin PCs suck i think there great i want 1 i just dont like when people say something about something thats fake so people stop buyin that thing and that person was right to choose a PC. so stop lieing and shut the H.E.L.L. up.
PS stay in school. ;)
of course it does, ... By: IamtheVOICE123. on 01 Dec 08, 02:58:13 of course it does, and is it grows, the movie industry gets more violated with spyware based media, they had a huge attack back in the early 80s and 90s, but now much more now... more corporate and government basis of hacking is out now... this is what hackers, crackers, and venom users, do, they change trend to do something that gives them a better end... so yah people dont realize this... its kinda strange, i know i sound like a paranoid but hey thats how things work
A Trojan virus ... By: blacksteel25. on 01 Dec 08, 01:58:32 A Trojan virus isn't basically a virus, but Malware. Mac's generally have more Malware out there than virus's. Sure, Mac's have less of a Malware threat, however that is because of market share. Malware is used to make money, so where it exists the most is on Windows. This may change for Malware as market share grows for Apple.
yah this i know of ... By: IamtheVOICE123. on 30 Nov 08, 00:14:30 yah this i know of but i try not to talk to complicated, i try to keep it about as easily understandible but to try and give out as much information without people trying to say "what did he say" but thx for commenting man, your comments are always regarded in high standard
it sounds more like ... By: mrbit10. on 29 Nov 08, 22:03:56 it sounds more like a root kit in the firmware level from what I hear, but to be simple, market share has nothing to do with it, only system architecture as with the many worms that exploited unprotected network protocals within RPC in windows vs Linux at the time when both were attacked with the same proof of concept in code red vs slapper.
using the word ... By: mrbit10. on 29 Nov 08, 21:55:34 using the word registry is incorrect for hardware purposes, you are after HAL or hardware abstraction layer which all OSs have different implementations of, as for software registry as with MS other systems use property or library files usually broken down by user permissions and for the subsystems.
wow again another ... By: IamtheVOICE123. on 28 Nov 08, 07:47:26 wow again another smartass coming onto my video... name a single fucking anti-virus that you have to us on a specific os, i know quite a few that dont, such as avg, mcafee, and ad-aware dont use an os.... interesting that you state that... like i said before, there isnt a single program other than nortan anti-virus that needs to be work on a specific os... try looking into your sources before you go starting shit...fyi... mac is just a brand deal with it, cause thats all it will ever be, a brand
i cant bellieve you ... By: ranjeevz10. on 28 Nov 08, 07:41:34 i cant bellieve you spit out shit abut u knowing more than us about viruses, but. u say that anti-virus programs dont depend on the OS, meaning that u can download any anti-virus, and it will work on any OS, sure dude ur a genius so i can go buy any anti virus even if its written FOR WINDOWS on it. and ima instal it on my mac just cuz U,fagget, tink ur soo smart -_-" Mac Wins|Deal With It
there are anti ... By: IamtheVOICE123. on 27 Nov 08, 18:23:05 there are anti virus programs for computers moron, it doesnt say its for windows, it doesnt say its for any os, it says its there and out there... i mean seriously man, you are absoletely full of shit
for you info, that ... By: IamtheVOICE123. on 27 Nov 08, 16:53:56 for you info, that was a sneeze... and secondly, how do you even think that chimpout123 ois my father? cause of microwhatevers video about his lame detective work? wow get a clue
lol... yah i had ... By: IamtheVOICE123. on 13 Dec 08, 02:30:37 lol... yah i had several of them on but my current computer was blocking a lot of the light really, i guess im gonna have to buy a lamp sometime
Dude- put a light ... By: ZAK248313. on 13 Dec 08, 01:14:44 Dude- put a light on.
really? try looking ... By: IamtheVOICE123. on 31 Dec 08, 20:40:38 really? try looking back at the video again, you will see i own'd his ass yet again
More like how emeek ... By: gaahhhhhh. on 31 Dec 08, 18:23:47 More like how emeek kept owning you lmao
Hope it come back ... By: oOADROo. on 30 Dec 08, 23:00:27 Hope it come back fixed.
Mac heads are just pass time for us pc users :D
Yah i know, but as ... By: IamtheVOICE123. on 30 Dec 08, 20:50:17 Yah i know, but as long as i get it back, fixed and in good shape idc how long they have it... lol, btw man you should see how i kept owning emeek over and over again on his comment section lol... bitching about how his alienware looks without even knowing that all the functions hes bitching about aren't even supposed to be a big deal
Thanks M8. Its ok. ... By: oOADROo. on 30 Dec 08, 16:55:45 Thanks M8. Its ok. Im finished from Mac Vs PC. All my shit will be uploaded on some there web site. Hope to get your Alien ware back real soon, 3 weeks is a long time :-(
please i dont wanna ... By: IamtheVOICE123. on 04 Dec 08, 22:59:05 please i dont wanna see any trolls on my comments, all trolls will be blocked and removed
*defending the PC ... By: sunnz. on 14 Dec 08, 15:34:04 *defending the PC is enough*, sorry typo, but yea I mean there are just hard myths around, that you can just show, nope, that's just wrong, it doesn't happen on a PC, and you don't have to mention about Macs.
Ohh Ok fair enough ... By: sunnz. on 14 Dec 08, 15:32:30 Ohh Ok fair enough there is a lot of bullshit about PC around it is great to have someone to bust the myths about it.
However I think you should try not to make assumption about Macs, because it seems like you don't really know that much about it, I don't blame you, but people tend to ignore what you said about PC if you make one mistake talking about Macs, even if you were correct about the PC... but yea that's just my opinion that depending the PC is enough.
well that and i do ... By: IamtheVOICE123. on 14 Dec 08, 15:22:53 well that and i do like to state some facts other than the imperical myths so often played, although i dont try to pretend to know much about macs (being is i never used them so i dont have an oppinion) but i have an apple ipod which btw works pretty awesome so far, the only thing i dislike of macs is the inability to upgrade most of their computers, and the only product that allows for upgrades like graphics, ram, is a workstation, not an architecture like my alienware
Ohh I see that you ... By: sunnz. on 14 Dec 08, 15:19:43 Ohh I see that you have been watching this Mac vs PC thing for quite some time and now like to give your 2 cents about it?
im not saying ... By: IamtheVOICE123. on 26 Nov 08, 03:44:39 im not saying windows is better than mac you fucking moron, all im saying is an os is user preference, ive know some people who prefer xp over it, and some prefer vista over it... but that doesnt mean its not any better... its user preference, this is stated not only by me... but college professor from Arco Sanui in Russia, and Michael Lebon in the UK which are two of the worlds most wide renowned computer and software professors, if im wrong, then they are wrong in that effect
Why do you view ... By: eddyr78. on 26 Nov 08, 03:37:39 Why do you view Chris porllo as a complete joke? You think you know more than him about computers and software? I don't think so that guy knows what hes talking about. And you havent said why you think windows is better i want to know what you have to so.
because apple has ... By: IamtheVOICE123. on 26 Nov 08, 03:29:41 because apple has done its fair share of law suites towards microsoft of supposed copyrights and they always loose everytime, not to mention of microsoft copyrights then why is it that apple copyrights microsoft yet they never file a lawsuite
interesting you say ... By: IamtheVOICE123. on 26 Nov 08, 03:28:22 interesting you say that about chris, cause everytime i bring him up with my computer professor, my computer arts teacher, along with many of my own friends who build their own computers, create their own software and many others view him as a complete joke including myself... also as for mrbit? you obviously have a big fucking mouth if you are here speaking for him, he doesnt even state osx is better, he states "its user preference with the mac os x" as for copyright? dont make me laugh
Listen here stupid ... By: eddyr78. on 26 Nov 08, 03:12:45 Listen here stupid fuck Chris parillo knows probably more than most users on here He is respected by people on here. So for you to call him a retard makes you a complete idiot. And mrbit does think osx is better than windows. And for windows what they do is copy everything mac comes out with they can't come up with anything of their own.
chris prillo? omg ... By: IamtheVOICE123. on 26 Nov 08, 03:06:27 chris prillo? omg you resort to that utter retard as well? as for mrbit10... he doesnt explain why osx is better, he explains hardware and software reasoning, he hardly does mac vs. pc fucking idiot, im his subscriber in case you can't read
Proven false every ... By: eddyr78. on 26 Nov 08, 03:04:31 Proven false every time thats why emeek has gone and looked up info and proven you guys wrong. And Check out mrbit10 or Chris Parillos videos they show why osx is better.
as for the kosts ... By: IamtheVOICE123. on 26 Nov 08, 03:00:44 as for the kosts ownage videos about me? your kidding right? ive seen them all and to tell the truth, hes about as logical as a dimwit, all he does is pick apart what people say and twist it around and make fun of it... really now... how is that pwning anyone including me?
and really huh? so ... By: IamtheVOICE123. on 26 Nov 08, 02:59:25 and really huh? so thats why emeek77 and thekost are proven false almost every single time they open there mouths? interesting
so your logic is ... By: IamtheVOICE123. on 26 Nov 08, 02:58:50 so your logic is simple its saying "we've used both and we know better than you do" wow thats about as pointedly claim and false as anything else, its not enough to use a compute moron, you have to know hot it works, what operates and gives computers performances and everything else... and what do you know of hardware and software and what it does diff... im stating facts and giving out technical explainations and your stating it false with oppinions?
Mac users don't ... By: eddyr78. on 26 Nov 08, 02:31:48 Mac users don't come in here and talk without knowing. We been windows users and we got tired with all the bullshit microsoft puts out. So we moved to a mac and realized its just better than windows. You deal with less problems on osx and its just a smoother os. And we look at reviews we know out facts We don't just talk. And when there's something we don't know we look it up. and every statement that pc users have given me ive been able to prove them wrong and i have shown them proof
Not knowing ... By: eddyr78. on 26 Nov 08, 02:26:17 Not knowing anything. Your not understanding what im saying. Mac users know how to use windows and know everything abut the pc because we came from using a pc. OSX is just a better os. And you say that emeek77 doesn't know what he's talking abut, and the kOST you don't want to even get into it with the kost because he is going to tear you aprat with his video. I can tell you that Emeek and the Kost know about pc's and thats why they have the right to talk about windows.
yet at the same ... By: IamtheVOICE123. on 26 Nov 08, 02:18:25 yet at the same time people like you call alienware computers pieces of shit, and its people like you make pointed claims towards pc's that arent even true.... please try giving actual real and legistical statements here, and all im doing is stating an introduction, your the one coming here talking shit and not knowing anything
What you don't ... By: eddyr78. on 26 Nov 08, 01:54:22 What you don't understand is that we mac users are able to talk, why because us mac users came from using a pc. We know how to use both and we can compare them and we see why osx is better. i can tell you that pc users are the ones that really talk shit because they don't know nothing about the mac most haven't even used one and they start talking shit they don;t know.
compatibility is ... By: mrbit10. on 29 Nov 08, 21:42:09 compatibility is the main problem with people building their own, there are a lot of opportunity costs to consider in building a custom. I have 3 customs in my house.
exactly... i guess ... By: IamtheVOICE123. on 27 Nov 08, 20:22:41 exactly... i guess i kinda talked to fast abit for most people to understand it really... but its also in the last effects of the video, that those that also build their own computers usually try to get even better computers than those out there on the market, i mean the only way to get a better gaming computer than alienware is to build one, not to mention the with media based computers like apple... the only way to get one better than their media based computer is to build one
Ok, so the point ... By: bombkangaroo. on 27 Nov 08, 20:06:45 Ok, so the point was that custom hardware needs to be researched to ensure compatibility, and that the ideal specification is determined by the intended purpose of the computer?
actually i was ... By: IamtheVOICE123. on 27 Nov 08, 20:05:08 actually i was speaking upon technical terms really... but thanks for critism, i tend to do things off the top of my head... its bassically how i do things...
thank you for the ... By: IamtheVOICE123. on 27 Nov 08, 20:04:21 thank you for the internet... but what i was stating was the function of custom built computers and giving off examples... and i dont really write anything down, i do things off the top of my head... this was mainly to show how people think what a waist of time building computers are... which is untrue, and also people who tend to think they could get any part when in reality, they cant... and they need to use parts based upon how the computer will excell at
in a logical and ... By: bombkangaroo. on 27 Nov 08, 19:54:35 in a logical and coherent way, so that you lead the viewer towards your objective: what you are actually trying to say.
Have you read David Sirlin's articles on how to be a good writer? I think they could benefit you and your videos greatly.
It would also be nice if you spoke more clearly, and tried to eliminate pauses and mispronunciations with planning and editing.
I just watched that ... By: bombkangaroo. on 27 Nov 08, 19:48:51 I just watched that twice, and I still have no idea what the point of the video was.
One time was full-screen just so I couldn't be distracted by anything else.
Your video just seemed to be a number of statements, made in no particular order, and with the crux of what you were saying lost somewhere in that verbal haystack.
I'm not saying this to bash you, I intend this to be taken constructively. I recommend that you put your thoughts down on paper/notepad/whatever, and then order them
wow another troll ... By: IamtheVOICE123. on 27 Nov 08, 19:00:52 wow another troll to block, fyi, if i am wrong then why dont you just tell me how im wrong instead of stating bs claims and insulting me
In fact, you are so ... By: rangerd102. on 27 Nov 08, 18:40:30 In fact, you are so amazingly ignorant that you make emeek sound intelligent. Wow, seriously impressed by your complete lack of understanding. You are the Sarah Palin of the computer world.
What the fuck are ... By: rangerd102. on 27 Nov 08, 18:38:23 What the fuck are you talking about? You are completely wrong. You don't even know how to pronounce the names of the components. I would go into detail about how wrong you are, but it is obvious that you are too slow to understand. You should educate yourself before you make an asshole of yourself. Please shut up and take the video down before you embarrass yourself more.
Mabe you didn't ... By: IamtheVOICE123. on 18 Dec 08, 00:33:49 Mabe you didn't even listen to what i said i said "another sect relating to christianity" good old creationists and their quote so very predictable
You have no idea ... By: etownoil98. on 18 Dec 08, 00:16:20 You have no idea what you are talking about!
Catholics arent christians!
For many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and shall deceive many
And many false prophets shall rise, and shall deceive many.And because iniquity shall abound, the love of many shall wax cold.Then if any man shall say unto you, Lo, here is Christ, or there; believe it not.
Latest comments made on this video:
By: applerocks. on 04 Jan 09, 15:54:13
Mac has viruses but very few like 50 to 60..Now that apple is getting popular and Hackers are turning there targets on Mac OS X too.
By: IamtheVOICE123. on 01 Jan 09, 22:16:55
I see, well then thanks for letting me know, a friend of mine gave me that online for usage and without thinking i guess i should have seen if it was up to date or not... thanks for the info, damnit all my links for malware and virus's for the mac is in my other computer (really old dell working with right now)
By: dannewashere. on 01 Jan 09, 22:12:36
uhm the first article is 9 years old and doesn't even mention Os x . maybe you didnt know but apples operating systems before os x was not based on unix. Os 9 had a very small userbase compared to os x but it did have alot of malware and viruses. the last article is three years old and is about a security flaw that apple obviously has patched a long time ago. also according to f-secure that is mentioned in the last article the number of maliciously created software for macs is acually decreasing
By: IamtheVOICE123. on 01 Jan 09, 21:47:59
htt p://ww w. faqs. org/faqs/computer-virus/macintosh-faq/ ht tp://antivirus. about. com/od/macintoshresource/a/inqtanaa. htm Try those links on for size, fyi i just woke up
By: dannewashere. on 01 Jan 09, 18:33:48
sure get alot more malware. could you please explain how the fuck macs get more malware then windows machines (or windows users if that was what u meant)??
By: dannewashere. on 01 Jan 09, 18:30:35
acually i wasnt talking about the sophos article. i was talking about apples antivirus page. which was uppdated with new version numbers of the software. its seems that u think windows viruses does affect macs when u said that macs
By: IamtheVOICE123. on 01 Jan 09, 15:56:48
Posted on December 2nd, 2008 by Graham Cluley, Sophos Filed under: Apple, Malware This is exactly what it says on the site, not updated in 2008, but posted, owned again... and who said anything about windows malware effecting osx?
By: dannewashere. on 01 Jan 09, 15:46:39
the article was updated because the versions of virus protection software mentioned in the article was more then 5 years old. there is no real need for it , but no system can be completly secure. and also having antivirus software installed would prevent sending infected files to windows users. and also u cant say that macs get alot more malware then most, thats the stupidest thing i have ever heard. windows malware doesnt doesnt affect os x and thats not what they meant in the article either.
By: IamtheVOICE123. on 01 Jan 09, 04:38:10
Again you do a comparison that's not really needed... and In case you didn't see what I said to Emeek, depending on the hardware, the size of the hard rive and so forth it doesn't even need to be weekly, that's only the example I gave if you had a low end computer, for a high end computer like mine, I only need to it once every 3-6 months... on a computer with medium specs and its once every 3months, but that's more or less it
By: gaahhhhhh. on 01 Jan 09, 03:06:38
Are they so different? What if you need to use the computer (As you might need to use your car) but you need to run 2 hours of maintenance (You need to replace a flat on your car). You can't get as much work done (You miss your appointment). With a Mac (A MORE reliable car) you spend only 30 minutes each month running maintenance (You change the oil). Indeed, car maintenance and computer maintenance are inherently different, but can be compared accurately.
By: IamtheVOICE123. on 01 Jan 09, 02:59:18
Car maintenance and computer maintenance are two completely diff things, with a computer, you just do some programs, click them on and wait for it to be done, while your waiting, go do something like maybe watch a movie, thats an entire time spent done watching a movie so i think i pretty much did my point there
By: gaahhhhhh. on 01 Jan 09, 02:30:43
And you never elaborated as to why I'm a moron. I'd like to hear that as well.
By: gaahhhhhh. on 01 Jan 09, 02:27:26
Oh and by the way, Yeah I did block you because I got fed up with this back and forth non-sense. I un-blocked you soon after figuring you'd let it go.
By: gaahhhhhh. on 01 Jan 09, 02:26:17
lmfao, you call that owning someone? I don't understand where the point you're trying to make quoting me. It makes you look like more of a fool. Seriously though, Answer the question. If you had to spend 2-3 hours a week for maintenance on your car, Would you still say it was good? No. Granted, spending 30 minutes per month for maintenance on a car isn't great either. The point is, is that it's better.
By: IamtheVOICE123. on 01 Jan 09, 01:13:00
If it's outdated then why would apple bother their time with it eh?
By: mykeman83. on 01 Jan 09, 00:55:31
did u read the reply from apple on the article? apple took off the article from their website and they said that it was outdated and that mac os x is fully secured from the get go. i dont have an antivirus and there is absolutely no need for it. thats my opinion